← All Units← 返回单元列表 ← Course Hub← 课程主页
A B  C A L C U L U S
Chapter 1 · Solutions第一章 · 解析

Limits & Continuity · Solutions极限与连续 · 解析

Worked Solutions to the AP-Style Practice SetAP 风格练习题配套解析

EASY MEDIUM HARD FRQ LEVEL

Topics 1.1 - 1.16专题 1.1 至 1.16AB



PART ITopics 1.1 - 1.16专题 1.1 至 1.16

Multiple Choice Solutions选择题解析

Q1EASY 1.4 Estimating from Tables1.4 表格估算极限No Calculator[2 marks]

The table gives values of $f(x)$ near $x=2$; estimate $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$.下表给出了 $f(x)$ 在 $x=2$ 附近的值,估计 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$。

Answer:答案: (C) $5$

Read the trend from both sides从两侧读出趋势 M1·A1

As $x\to 2^{-}$ the values $4.61,\,4.9601,\,4.996$ climb steadily toward $5$; as $x\to 2^{+}$ the values $5.004,\,5.0401,\,5.41$ come down toward $5$ from above. (M1)当 $x\to 2^{-}$ 时,$4.61,\,4.9601,\,4.996$ 稳步逼近 $5$;当 $x\to 2^{+}$ 时,$5.004,\,5.0401,\,5.41$ 从上方逼近 $5$。(M1)

Both one-sided trends converge to the same value, so the table estimate is $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)=5$. (A1)两侧趋势收敛于同一值,故由表格估计 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)=5$。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $4$ reads a single nearest entry ($f(1.9)=4.61$) and rounds, treating one tabulated value as the limit. (B) $4.5$ averages the two outermost entries instead of following the trend inward from both sides. (D) is chosen when the left values (all below $5$) and the right values (all above $5$) are read as disagreeing; approaching a common value from opposite sides is exactly what a two-sided limit looks like.(A) $4$ 只读取最靠近的单个数据($f(1.9)=4.61$)并取整,把某一个表格值当作极限。(B) $4.5$ 对最外侧两项取平均,而非从两侧向内追踪趋势。(D) 出自把左侧各值(均小于 $5$)与右侧各值(均大于 $5$)视为互相矛盾的学生;从两侧趋近同一数值,正是双侧极限应有的样子。
Insight.要点。 A table only ever supports an estimate, never a proof: it shows a trend, not a guarantee. Read the columns closest to $x=2$ from both directions, not just the nearest single row, since a table can hide a discontinuity between its sampled points.表格只能支持估计,不能构成证明:它显示的是趋势,而非保证。应从两个方向读取最接近 $x=2$ 的列,而非只看最近的一行,因为表格可能掩盖了采样点之间的不连续。
Q2EASY 1.6 Algebraic Manipulation1.6 代数变形No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 3}\dfrac{x^2-9}{x-3}=$

Answer:答案: (C) $6$

Factor the difference of squares因式分解平方差 M1·A1

Direct substitution gives $\tfrac{0}{0}$, so factor the numerator: $x^{2}-9=(x-3)(x+3)$. (M1)直接代入得 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 不定式,故因式分解分子:$x^{2}-9=(x-3)(x+3)$。(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to 3}\frac{(x-3)(x+3)}{x-3}=\lim_{x\to 3}(x+3)=6. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ reports the limit of the numerator alone. (B) $3$ cancels correctly to $x+3$ but then writes down the excluded point $x=3$ instead of evaluating $x+3$ there. (D) treats the $\tfrac{0}{0}$ form as automatically fatal, when it is in fact the signal that a common factor is waiting to be cancelled.(A) $0$ 只报出分子的极限。(B) $3$ 正确约分为 $x+3$,却写下被排除的点 $x=3$,而非在该点对 $x+3$ 求值。(D) 把 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 型视为必然无解,而它实际上正是提示存在待约公因式的信号。
Insight.要点。 Any $\tfrac{0}{0}$ limit of a polynomial quotient signals a common factor: $(x-3)$ divides both top and bottom exactly, and canceling it lets direct substitution work on what remains.多项式商出现 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 不定式时,说明分子分母有公因式:$(x-3)$ 可同时整除分子分母,消去后即可对剩余部分直接代入。
Q3EASY 1.6 Rationalizing1.6 有理化No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 4}\dfrac{\sqrt{x}-2}{x-4}=$

Answer:答案: (B) $\dfrac{1}{4}$

Multiply by the conjugate乘以共轭表达式 M1·A1

Multiply numerator and denominator by $\sqrt{x}+2$: (M1)分子分母同乘 $\sqrt{x}+2$:(M1)

$$ \frac{\sqrt{x}-2}{x-4}\cdot\frac{\sqrt{x}+2}{\sqrt{x}+2}=\frac{x-4}{(x-4)(\sqrt{x}+2)}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}+2}\longrightarrow\frac{1}{2+2}=\frac{1}{4}. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ substitutes into the numerator only. (C) $\tfrac{1}{2}$ rationalises correctly to $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{x}+2}$ but then evaluates it with $\sqrt{x}$ taken as $0$ rather than as $2$. (D) $1$ cancels $\sqrt{x}-2$ against $x-4$ as though they were the same factor; they are not, which is precisely why the conjugate is needed.(A) $0$ 只对分子代入求值。(C) $\tfrac{1}{2}$ 正确有理化为 $\tfrac{1}{\sqrt{x}+2}$,却在求值时把 $\sqrt{x}$ 当作 $0$ 而非 $2$。(D) $1$ 把 $\sqrt{x}-2$ 与 $x-4$ 当作同一因式相约;二者并不相同,而这正是需要共轭有理化的原因。
Insight.要点。 A surd minus a constant in a $\tfrac{0}{0}$ limit almost always wants the conjugate: multiplying by $\sqrt{x}+2$ turns $x-4$ into a shared factor with the denominator, clearing the radical from the numerator.当 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 型极限中出现根式减常数时,几乎总应使用共轭有理化:乘以 $\sqrt{x}+2$ 可使 $x-4$ 成为与分母共有的因式,从而消去分子中的根号。
Q4MEDIUM 1.6 Special Trig Limits1.6 特殊三角极限No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\dfrac{\sin(5x)}{3x}=$

Answer:答案: (C) $\dfrac{5}{3}$

Engineer the standard form凑出标准形式 M1·A1

Write the quotient so the argument of $\sin$ matches its own denominator: (M1)改写商式,使 $\sin$ 的自变量与其分母一致:(M1)

$$ \frac{\sin(5x)}{3x}=\frac{5}{3}\cdot\frac{\sin(5x)}{5x}\longrightarrow\frac{5}{3}\cdot 1=\frac{5}{3}. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ sends $\sin(5x)\to 0$ while forgetting that the denominator vanishes too. (B) $\tfrac{3}{5}$ inverts the coefficient ratio, effectively matching $3x$ to $\sin(5x)$ the wrong way round: this is the single most common slip on engineered trig limits. (D) treats $\tfrac{0}{0}$ as nonexistent rather than indeterminate.(A) $0$ 令 $\sin(5x)\to 0$,却忘记分母同样趋于零。(B) $\tfrac{3}{5}$ 把系数比颠倒,相当于将 $3x$ 与 $\sin(5x)$ 反向配对:这是凑配型三角极限中最常见的失误。(D) 把 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 当作不存在,而非未定式。
Insight.要点。 $\displaystyle\lim_{u\to 0}\frac{\sin u}{u}=1$ only fires when the argument of $\sin$ matches the denominator exactly. Whenever the coefficients differ, engineer that match first, then pull the leftover ratio out front.$\displaystyle\lim_{u\to 0}\frac{\sin u}{u}=1$ 只有在 $\sin$ 的自变量与分母完全一致时才能直接使用。当系数不同时,须先凑出这一匹配,再把多余的比例提到式子前面。
Q5MEDIUM 1.6 Trig Limits1.6 三角极限No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\dfrac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}=$

Answer:答案: (B) $\dfrac{1}{2}$

Conjugate to a known limit共轭化归已知极限 M1·A1

Multiply by $\dfrac{1+\cos x}{1+\cos x}$: (M1)乘以 $\dfrac{1+\cos x}{1+\cos x}$:(M1)

$$ \frac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}=\frac{1-\cos^{2}x}{x^{2}(1+\cos x)}=\frac{\sin^{2}x}{x^{2}(1+\cos x)}=\left(\frac{\sin x}{x}\right)^{2}\cdot\frac{1}{1+\cos x}\longrightarrow 1^{2}\cdot\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ imports the first-order result $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x}\to 0$ without noticing that the denominator here is $x^{2}$, a different order entirely. (C) $1$ carries the value of the sine limit across by analogy. (D) treats $\tfrac{0}{0}$ as fatal. The distinction between (A) and (B) is the whole content of this item.(A) $0$ 套用一阶结论 $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x}\to 0$,却未注意此处分母为 $x^{2}$,阶数完全不同。(C) $1$ 类比正弦极限的值而生搬硬套。(D) 把 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 当作必然无解。(A) 与 (B) 之别正是本题的全部内容。
Insight.要点。 This limit is worth memorizing at $\tfrac12$: it is the second-order coefficient in the Taylor expansion of $\cos x$, and it is exactly why $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x}\to 0$ (Q17-style) while $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}\to\tfrac12$ (a different rate entirely).这个极限值 $\tfrac12$ 值得记忆:它正是 $\cos x$ 泰勒展开式中的二阶系数,也正是为何 $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x}\to 0$(速率更快)而 $\tfrac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}\to\tfrac12$(完全不同的趋近速率)的原因。
Q6MEDIUM 1.3 / 1.8 Squeeze Theorem from a Graph1.3 / 1.8 由图像应用夹逼定理No Calculator[2 marks]

The solid curve is the graph of $g$, trapped between the two dashed curves for every $x$. From the graph, find $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}g(x)$.实线为 $g$ 的图像,对每个 $x$ 它都被两条虚线夹住。由图像求 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}g(x)$。

Answer:答案: (C) $4$

Follow both dashed curves in to $x=0$沿两条虚线追踪至 $x=0$ M1·A1

Read the bounds off the graph as $x$ approaches $0$ from either side. The upper dashed curve falls toward height $4$ and the lower dashed curve rises toward the same height $4$; the two meet on the $y$-axis, so the gap between them closes to nothing there. (M1)观察 $x$ 从两侧趋于 $0$ 时两条虚线的走向:上方虚线下降至高度 $4$,下方虚线上升至同一高度 $4$,二者在 $y$ 轴上相交,故此处两界之间的间隙收缩为零。(M1)

The graph of $g$ lies between them for every $x$, so its values are forced into that closing gap. By the Squeeze Theorem, $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}g(x)=4$, however violently $g$ oscillates away from the origin. (A1)$g$ 的图像对每个 $x$ 都位于两界之间,其取值被迫落入这一不断收缩的间隙。由夹逼定理知 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}g(x)=4$,无论 $g$ 在远离原点处如何剧烈振荡。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ reports the $x$-coordinate at which the bounds pinch instead of the height they pinch to: it answers "where" when the question asks "what". (B) $2$ reads the lowest point the solid curve reaches anywhere on the displayed window, near the left edge, as though a limit were a minimum over the picture. A limit is a statement about one location only, and the behaviour of $g$ away from $x=0$ is irrelevant to it. (D) is chosen because $g$ oscillates and is given by no formula. That oscillation is exactly the condition the Squeeze Theorem is built for: the two bounds pin the limit without any information about the curve between them.(A) $0$ 报出的是两界相交处的 $x$ 坐标,而非其相交的高度:问的是"极限值是多少",答的却是"在哪里"。(B) $2$ 读取的是实线在整个可见窗口内的最低点(靠近左边缘),仿佛极限就是图中的最小值。极限只描述单一位置处的行为,$g$ 在远离 $x=0$ 处的表现与之无关。(D) 出自 $g$ 振荡且没有解析式这一印象。而这种振荡恰恰是夹逼定理适用的情形:两条界线无需关于中间曲线的任何信息即可锁定极限。
Insight.要点。 The Squeeze Theorem needs nothing about $g$ itself, not even that it is continuous: only that it is trapped between two functions with a common limit. That is why it is the tool of choice whenever $g$ is unknown or badly behaved but bounded.夹逼定理对 $g$ 本身没有任何要求,甚至不要求其连续,只要求它被两个极限相同的函数夹住即可。这正是为何当 $g$ 未知或性质不佳但有界时,夹逼定理是首选工具。
Q7HARD 1.3 / 1.11 One-Sided Limits and Continuity1.3 / 1.11 单侧极限与连续性No Calculator[3 marks]

From the graph of $f$ on $[0,5]$, decide which of statements I, II, III are true.根据 $f$ 在 $[0,5]$ 上的图像,判断命题 I、II、III 中哪些为真。

Answer:答案: (A) III only仅 III

Read the three quantities off the graph从图像读出三个量 M1

The left branch rises to the open circle at height $3$, so $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{-}}f(x)=3$. The right branch starts at height $1$ and climbs, so $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{+}}f(x)=1$. The filled dot at $(2,1)$ gives the function value itself: $f(2)=1$. (M1)左侧分支上升至高度 $3$ 处的空心圆,故 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{-}}f(x)=3$。右侧分支自高度 $1$ 处上升,故 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{+}}f(x)=1$。点 $(2,1)$ 处的实心点给出函数值本身:$f(2)=1$。(M1)

Test each statement逐一检验各命题 A1·A1

I is false: the two one-sided limits are $3$ and $1$, and a two-sided limit exists only when they agree. II is false: continuity at $x=2$ requires $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$ to exist in the first place, and it does not. (A1)I 为假:两个单侧极限分别为 $3$ 与 $1$,双侧极限只有在二者相等时才存在。II 为假:在 $x=2$ 处连续首先要求 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$ 存在,而它并不存在。(A1)

III is true: the right-hand limit is $1$ and $f(2)=1$, so $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{+}}f(x)=f(2)$. Only III holds, giving (A). (A1)III 为真:右极限为 $1$,且 $f(2)=1$,故 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^{+}}f(x)=f(2)$。仅 III 成立,故选 (A)。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) counts I as true by checking only that both one-sided limits exist, which is not the test: they must also be equal. (C) reads III as though it said "continuous", but agreement on one side only is right-continuity, a strictly weaker condition than continuity. (D) is the answer of a student who never reads $f(2)$ off the filled dot and so cannot see that III is true.(B) 仅验证两个单侧极限都存在便判定 I 为真,但判据并非如此:二者还必须相等。(C) 把 III 误读为「连续」,然而仅单侧相等只是右连续,其条件严格弱于连续。(D) 是未从实心点读出 $f(2)$ 的学生所选,因而无法看出 III 为真。
Insight.要点。 A graph question at AP level rarely asks for one quantity. It asks you to separate three that students routinely merge: the existence of a two-sided limit, the value of the function, and the equality of the two. Continuity is the statement that all three line up. Failing any one of them breaks continuity, and the graph is drawn precisely so that exactly one of the three holds.AP 水平的图像题很少只考查单一的量,而是要求区分学生常常混为一谈的三者:双侧极限是否存在、函数值是多少、以及二者是否相等。连续性正是这三者完全吻合的表述。其中任何一条不成立即破坏连续性,而本图的设计恰好使三者中仅有一条成立。
Q8MEDIUM 1.11 / 1.13 Continuity at a Point1.11 / 1.13 点连续性No Calculator[2 marks]

Let $f(x)=\begin{cases}\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{x-2}, & x\ne 2\\[4pt]k, & x=2\end{cases}$. For what value of $k$ is $f$ continuous at $x=2$?设 $f(x)=\begin{cases}\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{x-2}, & x\ne 2\\[4pt]k, & x=2\end{cases}$,$k$ 取何值时 $f$ 在 $x=2$ 处连续?

Answer:答案: (C) $4$

Match $k$ to the limit令 $k$ 等于极限值 M1·A1

For $x\ne 2$, factor: $\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{x-2}=\dfrac{(x-2)(x+2)}{x-2}=x+2$, so $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)=2+2=4$. (M1)当 $x\ne 2$ 时,因式分解:$\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{x-2}=\dfrac{(x-2)(x+2)}{x-2}=x+2$,故 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)=2+2=4$。(M1)

Continuity requires $f(2)=\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$, so $k=4$. (A1)连续性要求 $f(2)=\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}f(x)$,故 $k=4$。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ sets $k$ to the value that makes the numerator vanish rather than to the limit. (B) $2$ reports the location $x=2$ instead of the limiting value there. (D) is chosen on sight of $\tfrac{0}{0}$; the whole point of a removable discontinuity is that a single value of $k$ repairs it.(A) $0$ 把 $k$ 取为使分子取零的值,而非取为极限值。(B) $2$ 报出的是位置 $x=2$,而非该处的极限值。(D) 一见 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 便选;可去不连续的要义正在于存在唯一的 $k$ 值能将其修复。
Insight.要点。 This is the standard recipe for repairing a removable discontinuity: the limit already exists (the factor cancels), so continuity is restored by simply assigning that limiting value to the point. No other value of $k$ can work, since the limit is fixed regardless of $k$.这是修复可去间断点的标准方法:极限本已存在(因式可消去),只需将该极限值赋给该点即可恢复连续性。其他任何 $k$ 值都无法奏效,因为极限值与 $k$ 无关,是固定的。
Q9MEDIUM 1.10 Types of Discontinuity1.10 间断点类型No Calculator[2 marks]

$g(x)=\dfrac{x+1}{x^{2}+x}$ has which type of discontinuity at $x=0$?$g(x)=\dfrac{x+1}{x^{2}+x}$ 在 $x=0$ 处属于哪种不连续?

Answer:答案: (C) Infinite无穷不连续

Factor the denominator and test the numerator at $x=0$因式分解分母并检验分子在 $x=0$ 处的值 M1·A1

Factor: $x^{2}+x=x(x+1)$, so $g(x)=\dfrac{x+1}{x(x+1)}=\dfrac{1}{x}$ for $x\ne 0,-1$. (M1)因式分解:$x^{2}+x=x(x+1)$,故当 $x\ne 0,-1$ 时 $g(x)=\dfrac{x+1}{x(x+1)}=\dfrac{1}{x}$。(M1)

The factor $(x+1)$ cancels, but $x$ itself does not; at $x=0$ the numerator of the reduced form is $1\ne 0$ while the denominator $\to 0$, so $g$ blows up: this is an infinite discontinuity (vertical asymptote at $x=0$), not a removable one. (A1)因子 $(x+1)$ 可以消去,但 $x$ 本身不能。在 $x=0$ 处,约简后分子为 $1\ne 0$,而分母 $\to 0$,故 $g$ 发散:这是无穷不连续($x=0$ 处为竖直渐近线),而非可去不连续。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) sees a factor cancel and concludes that every cancellation produces a hole; the factor that cancels here is $(x+1)$, which makes $x=-1$ removable, while $x=0$ is untouched by it. (B) has no piecewise definition to jump between. (D) overlooks that $g(0)$ is undefined, since the denominator $x^{2}+x$ vanishes at $x=0$.(A) 见有因式约去便断定任何约分都产生空心点;此处约去的因式是 $(x+1)$,它使 $x=-1$ 成为可去点,而 $x=0$ 完全不受其影响。(B) 并无可供跳跃的分段定义。(D) 忽略了 $g(0)$ 无定义,因为分母 $x^{2}+x$ 在 $x=0$ 处取零。
Insight.要点。 This function has two flaws at two different points and they are different types: $x=-1$ is removable (that factor cancels), while $x=0$ is infinite (that factor survives in the denominator). Always check each zero of the denominator separately after factoring.该函数在两个不同点各有一处缺陷,且类型不同:$x=-1$ 处可去(该因子可消去),而 $x=0$ 处为无穷不连续(该因子在分母中保留)。因式分解后,务必分别检验分母的每一个零点。
Q10HARD 1.11 / 1.12 Piecewise Continuity1.11 / 1.12 分段函数的连续性No Calculator[3 marks]

Find $a$ and $b$ so that $f(x)=\begin{cases}2x+a, & x\le 1\\ bx^{2}+3, & 1\lt x\lt 2\\ 4x-b, & x\ge 2\end{cases}$ is continuous everywhere.求 $a$ 和 $b$,使 $f(x)=\begin{cases}2x+a, & x\le 1\\ bx^{2}+3, & 1\lt x\lt 2\\ 4x-b, & x\ge 2\end{cases}$ 处处连续。

Answer:答案: (A) $a=2,\ b=1$

Match the two junctions在两个分段接合点处匹配 M1·M1·A1

At $x=1$: the pieces must agree, so $2(1)+a=b(1)^{2}+3$, i.e. $a-b=1$. (M1)在 $x=1$ 处:两段须相等,故 $2(1)+a=b(1)^{2}+3$,即 $a-b=1$。(M1)

At $x=2$: the pieces must agree, so $b(2)^{2}+3=4(2)-b$, i.e. $4b+3=8-b$, giving $5b=5$, so $b=1$. (M1)在 $x=2$ 处:两段须相等,故 $b(2)^{2}+3=4(2)-b$,即 $4b+3=8-b$,解得 $5b=5$,$b=1$。(M1)

Substituting back into $a-b=1$ gives $a=1+b=2$. (A1)代回 $a-b=1$,得 $a=1+b=2$。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) and (C) each satisfy one junction and leave the other broken, which is what happens when the two continuity conditions are solved separately instead of as a system. (D) is chosen when the two conditions are assumed to conflict; with two junctions and two unknowns the system is exactly determined, and here it is consistent.(B) 与 (C) 各自只满足一个衔接点而使另一处断裂,这正是把两个连续性条件分开解、而非作为方程组联立求解的结果。(D) 出自认定两个条件互相冲突;两个衔接点对应两个未知数,方程组恰好确定,且此处相容。
Insight.要点。 Continuity at a piecewise junction is one equation per boundary point, since all three pieces here are polynomials (already continuous on their own domains), the only possible breaks are at the two seams. Two seams, two equations, two unknowns: the system is always exactly determined.分段函数在每个分界点处的连续性各对应一个方程,因本题三段均为多项式(在各自定义域内已连续),唯一可能出现间断的地方就是两个接缝处。两个接缝对应两个方程、两个未知数,方程组恰好可解。
Q11MEDIUM 1.14 Infinite Limits1.14 无穷极限No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2^-}\dfrac{x+3}{x-2}=$

Answer:答案: (B) $-\infty$

Track the sign of the denominator跟踪分母的符号 M1·A1

As $x\to 2^{-}$, the numerator $x+3\to 5\gt 0$, a positive constant near this point, while the denominator $x-2\to 0^{-}$ (small and negative, since $x<2$). (M1)当 $x\to 2^{-}$ 时,分子 $x+3\to 5\gt 0$,在该点附近为正常数;分母 $x-2\to 0^{-}$(因 $x<2$,趋近于 0 且为负)。(M1)

A positive number divided by a vanishing negative quantity diverges to $-\infty$. (A1)正数除以趋于零的负量将发散至 $-\infty$。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $+\infty$ gets the magnitude right and the sign wrong, having missed that $x-2$ is negative when $x$ approaches $2$ from the left. (C) $0$ inverts the roles of numerator and denominator. (D) $1$ compares only the leading $x$ terms, a rule that applies as $x\to\infty$, not at a finite point where the denominator vanishes.(A) $+\infty$ 大小判断正确而符号有误,未察觉 $x$ 从左侧趋于 $2$ 时 $x-2$ 为负。(C) $0$ 把分子与分母的角色颠倒。(D) $1$ 只比较首项 $x$,而该法则适用于 $x\to\infty$,并不适用于分母取零的有限点。
Insight.要点。 Whenever the denominator vanishes but the numerator does not, the limit is infinite, and the sign is decided by the sign of the numerator times the sign the denominator approaches from. Always test the side ($2^{-}$ vs $2^{+}$) separately; the two sides of this same limit go to opposite infinities.当分母趋于零而分子不趋于零时,极限为无穷,其符号由分子的符号与分母所趋近的方向符号共同决定。务必分别检验两侧($2^{-}$ 与 $2^{+}$);此极限的两侧会趋向相反的无穷。
Q12MEDIUM 1.15 Limits at Infinity1.15 无穷远处的极限No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}\dfrac{6x^{2}-x}{3x^{2}+4}=$

Answer:答案: (C) $2$

Divide by the highest power of $x$除以最高次幂 M1·A1

Divide numerator and denominator by $x^{2}$: (M1)分子分母同除以 $x^{2}$:(M1)

$$ \frac{6-1/x}{3+4/x^{2}}\longrightarrow\frac{6-0}{3+0}=2. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ applies the rule for a denominator of strictly higher degree, though the degrees here are equal. (B) $1$ assumes equal degrees always give $1$, ignoring the leading coefficients. (D) $\infty$ assumes every polynomial quotient diverges. Only the ratio of leading coefficients, $\tfrac{6}{3}$, settles it.(A) $0$ 套用分母次数严格更高时的法则,而此处两者次数相等。(B) $1$ 认定次数相等便必得 $1$,忽略了首项系数。(D) $\infty$ 认定任何多项式之商都发散。真正决定结果的只有首项系数之比 $\tfrac{6}{3}$。
Insight.要点。 Numerator and denominator have equal degree, so the limit at infinity is simply the ratio of leading coefficients, $\tfrac{6}{3}=2$. This shortcut always works when the degrees match; it needs the full division-by-$x^{2}$ argument only the first few times you use it.分子分母次数相同,故无穷处的极限即为最高次系数之比 $\tfrac{6}{3}=2$。只要次数相同,这一捷径总是成立;只有在最初几次使用时才需要写出完整的除以 $x^{2}$ 的过程。
Q13HARD 1.15 Limits at Infinity (Radical)1.15 无穷远处的极限(根式)No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}\dfrac{\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}}{x^{2}-3x}=$

Answer:答案: (C) $3$

Pull $x^{2}$ out of the root从根号中提出 $x^{2}$ M1·A1

Since $x\to\infty$ means $x^{2}\gt 0$ throughout, $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}=\sqrt{x^{4}\left(9+\tfrac{1}{x^{4}}\right)}=x^{2}\sqrt{9+\tfrac{1}{x^{4}}}$. (M1)因 $x\to\infty$ 时始终有 $x^{2}\gt 0$,故 $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}=\sqrt{x^{4}\left(9+\tfrac{1}{x^{4}}\right)}=x^{2}\sqrt{9+\tfrac{1}{x^{4}}}$。(M1)

Divide numerator and denominator by $x^{2}$: (M1)分子分母同除以 $x^{2}$:(M1)

$$ \frac{x^{2}\sqrt{9+1/x^{4}}}{x^{2}(1-3/x)}=\frac{\sqrt{9+1/x^{4}}}{1-3/x}\longrightarrow\frac{\sqrt{9}}{1}=3. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) $0$ treats the radical as being of lower order than the denominator. (B) $1$ reads $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}$ as $x^{2}$, dropping the $9$ that supplies the factor $3$. (D) is chosen when the $-3x$ term is thought to leave the denominator's sign ambiguous; as $x\to\infty$ the $x^{2}$ term dominates and the denominator is eventually positive.(A) $0$ 把根式当作比分母低阶。(B) $1$ 把 $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}$ 读作 $x^{2}$,丢掉了提供因子 $3$ 的那个 $9$。(D) 出自认为 $-3x$ 项使分母符号不定的学生;当 $x\to\infty$ 时 $x^{2}$ 项占主导,分母最终为正。
Insight.要点。 A square root of a degree-4 polynomial behaves like a degree-2 term, so $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}$ is comparable in size to $3x^{2}$, not $9x^{2}$: always pull $x^{2}$ (the square root of $x^{4}$) out from under the radical before dividing, never $x$.四次多项式的平方根其量级相当于二次项,故 $\sqrt{9x^{4}+1}$ 的量级与 $3x^{2}$ 相当,而非 $9x^{2}$:应先从根号下提出 $x^{2}$(即 $x^{4}$ 的平方根),再进行除法,切勿只提出 $x$。
Q14HARD 1.15 End Behavior1.15 末端行为No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to -\infty}\bigl(\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}+x\bigr)=$

Answer:答案: (A) $-2$

Rationalize the $\infty-\infty$ form对 $\infty-\infty$ 型不定式有理化 M1·A1

Multiply and divide by the conjugate $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}-x$: (M1)乘除以共轭表达式 $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}-x$:(M1)

$$ \sqrt{x^{2}+4x}+x=\frac{(x^{2}+4x)-x^{2}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}-x}=\frac{4x}{\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}-x}. $$

For $x\to-\infty$, write $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}=|x|\sqrt{1+4/x}=-x\sqrt{1+4/x}$ since $x<0$ means $|x|=-x$: (M1)当 $x\to-\infty$ 时,写 $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}=|x|\sqrt{1+4/x}=-x\sqrt{1+4/x}$,因 $x<0$ 时 $|x|=-x$:(M1)

$$ \frac{4x}{-x\sqrt{1+4/x}-x}=\frac{4x}{-x\left(\sqrt{1+4/x}+1\right)}=\frac{-4}{\sqrt{1+4/x}+1}\longrightarrow\frac{-4}{1+1}=-2. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (C) $+2$ is the trap this item is built around: it drops the sign introduced by $\sqrt{x^{2}}=|x|=-x$ when $x\to-\infty$. Any answer to a radical limit at $-\infty$ that never writes $|x|$ has almost certainly landed here. (B) $0$ approximates $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}$ by $|x|$ exactly and loses the correction term that carries the whole answer. (D) $\infty$ reads the sum as $x+x$.(C) $+2$ 正是本题所设的陷阱:它丢掉了当 $x\to-\infty$ 时由 $\sqrt{x^{2}}=|x|=-x$ 引入的负号。凡是在 $-\infty$ 处处理根式极限却始终未写出 $|x|$ 的解法,几乎必然落入此项。(B) $0$ 把 $\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}$ 直接近似为 $|x|$,从而丢失了承载全部答案的修正项。(D) $\infty$ 把该和式读作 $x+x$。
Insight.要点。 $\sqrt{x^{2}}=|x|$, never $x$: this is the single most common sign error at infinity. Along $x\to+\infty$ the same expression tends to $+2$, so $f(x)=\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}+x$ has two distinct horizontal asymptotes depending on direction, a genuinely two-sided answer.$\sqrt{x^{2}}=|x|$,绝非 $x$:这是无穷处最常见的符号错误。沿 $x\to+\infty$ 方向,同一表达式趋于 $+2$,因此 $f(x)=\sqrt{x^{2}+4x}+x$ 依方向不同而有两条不同的水平渐近线,是真正意义上的双侧答案。
Q15MEDIUM 1.16 IVT1.16 介值定理No Calculator[2 marks]

Let $f$ be continuous on $[0,3]$ with $f(0)=-2$ and $f(3)=5$. Which conclusion does the IVT guarantee?设 $f$ 在 $[0,3]$ 上连续,且 $f(0)=-2$,$f(3)=5$。介值定理可保证哪个结论?

Answer:答案: (A) $f(c)=0$ for some $c\in(0,3)$对某个 $c\in(0,3)$

Check which target value lies between $f(0)$ and $f(3)$检验哪个目标值介于 $f(0)$ 与 $f(3)$ 之间 M1·A1

The IVT guarantees $f(c)=d$ only for $d$ strictly between $f(0)=-2$ and $f(3)=5$. Checking each option: $0\in(-2,5)$ (works); $6\notin(-2,5)$; $-3\notin(-2,5)$; differentiability is never a conclusion of the IVT. (M1)介值定理仅保证 $d$ 严格介于 $f(0)=-2$ 与 $f(3)=5$ 之间时 $f(c)=d$ 成立。逐一检验:$0\in(-2,5)$(成立);$6\notin(-2,5)$;$-3\notin(-2,5)$;可导性从来都不是介值定理的结论。(M1)

So the guaranteed conclusion is (A): $f(c)=0$ for some $c\in(0,3)$. (A1)故保证成立的结论是 (A):存在 $c\in(0,3)$ 使 $f(c)=0$。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) $6$ and (C) $-3$ both name values outside the interval $[-2,5]$ spanned by the two endpoint outputs, and the IVT guarantees nothing outside that span. (D) confuses continuity with differentiability: continuity is the hypothesis of the IVT, and it does not imply a derivative exists anywhere.(B) $6$ 与 (C) $-3$ 所给的值均在两端点输出所张成的区间 $[-2,5]$ 之外,而介值定理对该范围之外的值不作任何保证。(D) 把连续性与可导性混为一谈:连续性是介值定理的条件,它并不蕴涵任何点处导数存在。
Insight.要点。 The IVT only ever guarantees values strictly between the two endpoint outputs; it says nothing about values outside that range, even if they seem plausible. Options like (B) and (C) here are traps for students who only check "is $f$ continuous" and forget to check "is $d$ actually between $f(a)$ and $f(b)$."介值定理只保证严格介于两端点函数值之间的值;对于区间之外的值,即便看似合理,它也不作任何保证。选项 (B) 和 (C) 正是陷阱,专为只检验"$f$ 是否连续"而忘记检验"$d$ 是否确实介于 $f(a)$ 与 $f(b)$ 之间"的学生所设。
Q16HARD 1.16 IVT (Table)1.16 介值定理(表格)No Calculator[2 marks]

The continuous function $h$ has selected values below. What is the minimum number of real zeros of $h$ on $[1,9]$ guaranteed by the IVT?连续函数 $h$ 的部分值如表所示。介值定理能保证 $h$ 在 $[1,9]$ 上至少有多少个实零点?

Answer:答案: (D) $4$

Count the sign changes between consecutive points统计相邻各点间的变号次数 M1·A1

The values are $h(1)=-4,\ h(3)=2,\ h(5)=-1,\ h(7)=3,\ h(9)=-5$. Since $h$ is continuous on each subinterval $[1,3],[3,5],[5,7],[7,9]$, the IVT applies wherever consecutive values have opposite signs. (M1)各值为 $h(1)=-4,\ h(3)=2,\ h(5)=-1,\ h(7)=3,\ h(9)=-5$。因 $h$ 在每个子区间 $[1,3],[3,5],[5,7],[7,9]$ 上均连续,只要相邻两值异号,介值定理即可应用。(M1)

Every consecutive pair alternates in sign: $(-,+)$ on $[1,3]$, $(+,-)$ on $[3,5]$, $(-,+)$ on $[5,7]$, $(+,-)$ on $[7,9]$: four sign changes, so the IVT guarantees at least $4$ zeros. (A1)相邻各值符号交替:$[1,3]$ 上为 $(-,+)$,$[3,5]$ 上为 $(+,-)$,$[5,7]$ 上为 $(-,+)$,$[7,9]$ 上为 $(+,-)$:共四次变号,故介值定理保证至少 $4$ 个零点。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 Every wrong option here is an undercount. (C) $3$ is the near miss, dropping one of the four alternations, most often the last one between $t=7$ and $t=9$. (B) $2$ counts the alternations in pairs. (A) $1$ compares only the two endpoint values, $h(1)=-4$ and $h(9)=-5$, which share a sign and so certify nothing on their own.此处每个错误选项都属计数不足。(C) $3$ 为一步之差,漏掉四次变号中的一次,最常漏掉 $t=7$ 与 $t=9$ 之间的最后一次。(B) $2$ 把变号两两成对计数。(A) $1$ 只比较两端点值 $h(1)=-4$ 与 $h(9)=-5$,二者同号,本身不能证明任何结论。
Insight.要点。 Each sign change between two continuous, consecutive sample points guarantees at least one zero in that subinterval by the IVT applied to $d=0$; adjacent guarantees stack, they never cancel. The true number of zeros could be higher (the function could wiggle back across zero within a subinterval), but never lower than this count.对连续函数在两个相邻采样点间每一次变号,对 $d=0$ 应用介值定理即可保证该子区间内至少有一个零点;相邻的保证可以累加,绝不会相互抵消。实际零点数可能更多(函数可能在某子区间内多次穿越零点),但绝不会少于此计数。
Q17MEDIUM 1.7 Selecting Procedures1.7 方法选择No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}\dfrac{(2+h)^{3}-8}{h}=$

Answer:答案: (D) $12$

Expand the cube and cancel展开立方式并消去公因式 M1·A1

Expand: $(2+h)^{3}=8+12h+6h^{2}+h^{3}$, so the numerator is $12h+6h^{2}+h^{3}=h(12+6h+h^{2})$. (M1)展开:$(2+h)^{3}=8+12h+6h^{2}+h^{3}$,故分子为 $12h+6h^{2}+h^{3}=h(12+6h+h^{2})$。(M1)

$$ \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{h(12+6h+h^{2})}{h}=\lim_{h\to 0}(12+6h+h^{2})=12. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) $6$ recognises the derivative form and then applies the power rule with one factor of the base dropped, computing $3\cdot 2$ instead of $3\cdot 2^{2}$. (C) $8$ reports $f(2)$, the value of the function, where the difference quotient asks for $f'(2)$, its rate of change. (A) $0$ expands the cube and cancels the $h$ terms incorrectly.(B) $6$ 已识别出导数形式,却在使用幂法则时少乘了一个底数,算成 $3\cdot 2$ 而非 $3\cdot 2^{2}$。(C) $8$ 报出的是函数值 $f(2)$,而差商所求的是其变化率 $f'(2)$。(A) $0$ 展开立方后错误地消去了含 $h$ 的各项。
Insight.要点。 This is a difference quotient in disguise: it is exactly $\dfrac{f(2+h)-f(2)}{h}$ for $f(x)=x^{3}$, so the answer $12$ is $f'(2)=3(2)^{2}=12$, the power rule showing up before it is formally introduced.这实际上是一个伪装的差商:它恰是 $f(x)=x^{3}$ 在 $\dfrac{f(2+h)-f(2)}{h}$ 处的表达式,故答案 $12$ 即为 $f'(2)=3(2)^{2}=12$,在正式引入幂法则之前,它已悄然出现。
Q18HARD 1.6 Complex Fractions1.6 繁分式No Calculator[2 marks]

$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\dfrac{\frac{1}{x+3}-\frac{1}{3}}{x}=$

Answer:答案: (A) $-\dfrac{1}{9}$

Combine the inner fractions first先合并内部分式 M1·A1

Combine over a common denominator: $\dfrac{1}{x+3}-\dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{3-(x+3)}{3(x+3)}=\dfrac{-x}{3(x+3)}$. (M1)通分:$\dfrac{1}{x+3}-\dfrac{1}{3}=\dfrac{3-(x+3)}{3(x+3)}=\dfrac{-x}{3(x+3)}$。(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to 0}\frac{1}{x}\cdot\frac{-x}{3(x+3)}=\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{-1}{3(x+3)}=\frac{-1}{3(3)}=-\frac{1}{9}. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (C) $+\tfrac{1}{9}$ has the right magnitude and the wrong sign, from combining $\tfrac{1}{x+3}-\tfrac{1}{3}$ over the common denominator without tracking the order of subtraction. (B) $0$ cancels the outer $x$ against nothing. (D) treats $\tfrac{0}{0}$ as fatal, when clearing the complex fraction resolves it in one step.(C) $+\tfrac{1}{9}$ 大小正确而符号有误,源于对 $\tfrac{1}{x+3}-\tfrac{1}{3}$ 通分时未追踪相减的次序。(B) $0$ 把外层的 $x$ 与并不存在的因式相约。(D) 把 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 当作必然无解,而通分化简一步即可解决。
Insight.要点。 A complex fraction divided by $x$ is a difference-quotient pattern for $f(x)=\tfrac{1}{x+3}$: the answer $-\tfrac19$ equals $f'(0)=-\tfrac{1}{(0+3)^{2}}$. Combining the inner fractions before touching the outer division is what turns the $0/0$ form into something factorable.除以 $x$ 的复合分式正是 $f(x)=\tfrac{1}{x+3}$ 的差商模式:答案 $-\tfrac19$ 恰等于 $f'(0)=-\tfrac{1}{(0+3)^{2}}$。先合并内部分式再处理外部除法,正是将 $0/0$ 不定式转化为可因式分解形式的关键。
Q19HARD 1.6 Analysing a Flawed Argument1.6 分析错误论证No Calculator[3 marks]

Locate the first incorrect step in the student's evaluation of $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{|x-2|}$.找出该学生计算 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}\dfrac{x^{2}-4}{|x-2|}$ 时第一处出错的步骤。

Answer:答案: (B) Step 2第 2 步

Step 1 is sound第 1 步无误 M1

The factorisation $x^{2}-4=(x-2)(x+2)$ is an identity, valid for every $x$. Nothing is wrong with it. (M1)分解式 $x^{2}-4=(x-2)(x+2)$ 是恒等式,对一切 $x$ 成立,并无错误。(M1)

Step 2 cancels across an absolute value第 2 步跨绝对值约分 A1

The cancellation asserts $\dfrac{x-2}{|x-2|}=1$, which holds only for $x\gt 2$. For $x\lt 2$ the quotient equals $-1$, so the simplification is valid on one side of $2$ and wrong on the other. (A1)该约分实际上断言 $\dfrac{x-2}{|x-2|}=1$,而这只在 $x\gt 2$ 时成立。当 $x\lt 2$ 时该商等于 $-1$,故此化简在 $2$ 的一侧成立、另一侧则不成立。(A1)

Split the two sides分别考察两侧 A1

$$ \lim_{x\to 2^{+}}\frac{(x-2)(x+2)}{x-2}=4, \qquad \lim_{x\to 2^{-}}\frac{(x-2)(x+2)}{-(x-2)}=-4. $$

The one-sided limits are $4$ and $-4$. They disagree, so the limit does not exist. (A1)两个单侧极限分别为 $4$ 与 $-4$,二者不等,故该极限不存在。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) suspects the factorisation, but an algebraic identity cannot be the source of a limit error. (C) blames the substitution, which is the natural guess when only the final number looks wrong; in fact Step 3 follows correctly from the (invalid) Step 2. (D) is by far the most common response: it accepts the cancellation because the algebra looks routine, and it is exactly the habit this item exists to break.(A) 怀疑因式分解,但代数恒等式不可能是极限出错的根源。(C) 归咎于代入,这是只看到最终数值有误时的自然猜测;实际上第 3 步是由(无效的)第 2 步正确推出的。(D) 是最常见的选择:因代数看似寻常而接受了该约分,而本题正是为纠正这一习惯而设。
Insight.要点。 An absolute value is a piecewise definition wearing a disguise. Whenever $|x-a|$ sits in a denominator and $x\to a$, the two-sided limit must be split before any cancelling: the sign of $x-a$ is the whole question. A limit that is asked two-sided while the expression behaves differently on each side is the standard construction for a "does not exist" answer.绝对值本质上是伪装过的分段定义。只要 $|x-a|$ 出现在分母且 $x\to a$,就必须先拆成两侧再谈约分:$x-a$ 的符号才是问题的全部。当题目要求双侧极限而表达式在两侧表现不同时,这正是构造「不存在」型答案的标准手法。
Q20MEDIUM 1.10 Discontinuity in Context1.10 情境中的间断No Calculator[3 marks]

Classify the behaviour of the parking charge $C$ at $t=2$ hours and interpret it.判断停车费用 $C$ 在 $t=2$ 小时处的性态并作出解释。

Answer:答案: (C)

Write the charge as a piecewise function将费用写成分段函数 M1

A stay of any length up to one hour costs $\$4$; each further hour begun adds $\$3$. Hence $C(t)=4$ on $0\lt t\le 1$, $C(t)=7$ on $1\lt t\le 2$, $C(t)=10$ on $2\lt t\le 3$, and $C(t)=13$ on $3\lt t\le 4$. (M1)停留时间不超过一小时收费 $\$4$;其后每开始一小时增加 $\$3$。故在 $0\lt t\le 1$ 上 $C(t)=4$,在 $1\lt t\le 2$ 上 $C(t)=7$,在 $2\lt t\le 3$ 上 $C(t)=10$,在 $3\lt t\le 4$ 上 $C(t)=13$。(M1)

Compare the two one-sided limits with $C(2)$将两个单侧极限与 $C(2)$ 比较 A1·A1

$\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 2^{-}}C(t)=7$ and $\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 2^{+}}C(t)=10$, while $C(2)=7$ because $t=2$ belongs to the interval $1\lt t\le 2$. (A1)$\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 2^{-}}C(t)=7$,$\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 2^{+}}C(t)=10$,而 $C(2)=7$,因为 $t=2$ 属于区间 $1\lt t\le 2$。(A1)

The one-sided limits are finite and unequal, which is precisely a jump discontinuity. The size of the jump is $10-7=3$ dollars, the charge incurred the instant the stay passes into its third hour. (A1)两个单侧极限有限且不相等,这正是跳跃不连续。跳跃量为 $10-7=3$ 美元,即停留时间刚进入第三小时时产生的费用。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (A) treats "the function has a value at $t=2$" as continuity, forgetting that continuity also demands the two-sided limit exist and match. (B) is chosen by students who compute only the left limit, find it equals $C(2)$, and conclude the mismatch must be removable; a removable discontinuity requires the two-sided limit to exist, and here it does not. (D) confuses an unbounded charge with a finite jump, which cannot happen: the charge is bounded on this domain.(A) 把「函数在 $t=2$ 处有定义」当作连续,忽略了连续还要求双侧极限存在且与函数值相等。(B) 出自只计算左极限、发现其等于 $C(2)$ 便断定为可去不连续的学生;可去不连续要求双侧极限存在,而此处并不存在。(D) 把无界费用与有限跳跃混为一谈,而这不可能发生:在该定义域上费用是有界的。
Insight.要点。 Step functions built from pricing, postage, and tax brackets are where jump discontinuities occur in practice, and the jump always carries a meaning in the units of the model. Reporting the classification without that interpretation answers half the question. Note also which endpoint each interval owns: whether $t=2$ belongs to the second or the third hour is what fixes $C(2)$, and it is decided by the wording "or any part of it", not by the graph.由定价、邮资和税级构成的阶梯函数正是跳跃不连续在实际中出现的场合,且跳跃量在模型的单位下总有其含义。只作分类而不给出这一解释,只答了一半。还须注意各区间归属哪个端点:$t=2$ 属于第二小时还是第三小时决定了 $C(2)$ 的取值,而这由「不足一小时按一小时计」的表述确定,而非由图像确定。
Q21HARD 1.6 Comparing Rates of Approach1.6 比较趋近速度No Calculator[3 marks]

Order $\sin x$, $x^{2}$, $1-\cos x$, and $x-\sin x$ from smallest to largest for $x$ close to $0^{+}$.当 $x$ 接近 $0^{+}$ 时,将 $\sin x$、$x^{2}$、$1-\cos x$、$x-\sin x$ 由小到大排序。

Answer:答案: (A)

Identify the order of vanishing of each quantity确定各量的趋零阶数 M1

The known limits of this unit already fix three of the four. From $\dfrac{\sin x}{x}\to 1$, the quantity $\sin x$ behaves like $x$. From $\dfrac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}\to\tfrac12$, the quantity $1-\cos x$ behaves like $\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$. The quantity $x^{2}$ is its own comparison. (M1)本单元的已知极限已确定其中三个。由 $\dfrac{\sin x}{x}\to 1$ 知 $\sin x$ 的性态与 $x$ 相同;由 $\dfrac{1-\cos x}{x^{2}}\to\tfrac12$ 知 $1-\cos x$ 的性态与 $\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$ 相同;$x^{2}$ 则以自身为比较基准。(M1)

Place $x-\sin x$ below all of them确定 $x-\sin x$ 小于其余各量 A1

For $0\lt x$ small, $\sin x$ is smaller than $x$ but only by a third-order amount, so $x-\sin x$ vanishes faster than any of the second-order quantities. Dividing by $x^{2}$ makes this concrete: $\dfrac{x-\sin x}{x^{2}}\to 0$, so $x-\sin x$ is eventually smaller than $x^{2}$, and smaller still than $\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$'s companions. (A1)当 $x\gt 0$ 且很小时,$\sin x$ 小于 $x$,但差值为三阶量,故 $x-\sin x$ 的趋零速度快于任何二阶量。除以 $x^{2}$ 可将此具体化:$\dfrac{x-\sin x}{x^{2}}\to 0$,故 $x-\sin x$ 最终小于 $x^{2}$,也小于与 $\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$ 同阶的各量。(A1)

Separate the two second-order quantities区分两个二阶量 A1

Both $1-\cos x$ and $x^{2}$ are second order, so the constant decides: $1-\cos x\approx\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}\lt x^{2}$. Hence the order is $x-\sin x\lt 1-\cos x\lt x^{2}\lt\sin x$, which is (A). A numerical spot check at $x=0.1$ gives $0.000167\lt 0.005\lt 0.01\lt 0.0998$, confirming it. (A1)$1-\cos x$ 与 $x^{2}$ 同为二阶量,故由系数决定:$1-\cos x\approx\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}\lt x^{2}$。因此排序为 $x-\sin x\lt 1-\cos x\lt x^{2}\lt\sin x$,即选项 (A)。取 $x=0.1$ 作数值验证得 $0.000167\lt 0.005\lt 0.01\lt 0.0998$,与结论一致。(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) gets the two second-order quantities the wrong way round by dropping the factor $\tfrac12$ in $1-\cos x\approx\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$, which is the single most common slip on this comparison. (C) reverses the whole ordering, reading "approaches zero fastest" as "largest". (D) places $1-\cos x$ below $x-\sin x$, mistaking a second-order quantity for a third-order one.(B) 因遗漏 $1-\cos x\approx\tfrac{x^{2}}{2}$ 中的系数 $\tfrac12$,把两个二阶量的次序颠倒,这是此类比较中最常见的失误。(C) 将整个排序颠倒,把「趋零最快」误读为「最大」。(D) 把 $1-\cos x$ 置于 $x-\sin x$ 之下,误将二阶量当作三阶量。
Insight.要点。 Two expressions can both tend to zero and still be nowhere near the same size. Ranking by the power of $x$ that governs each, and only then by the leading constant, is the reasoning that makes every indeterminate $\tfrac{0}{0}$ form tractable: the form is indeterminate precisely because it hides which of the two vanishing rates wins.两个表达式可以同时趋于零,而大小却相差甚远。先按主导 $x$ 的幂次排序、再按首项系数排序,这一推理正是使一切 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 型不定式变得可解的关键:该形式之所以不定,恰恰是因为它掩盖了两个趋零速率中哪一个占优。
Q22HARD 1.5 / 1.6 Solving for a Parameter1.5 / 1.6 求参数No Calculator[3 marks]

Find the constant $k$ for which $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 3}\dfrac{x^{2}+kx-12}{x-3}$ exists, and evaluate the limit.求使 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 3}\dfrac{x^{2}+kx-12}{x-3}$ 存在的常数 $k$,并求出该极限。

Answer:答案: (A) $k=1$, limit $7$极限为 $7$

The denominator forces the numerator to vanish分母迫使分子取零 M1

The denominator tends to $0$. If the numerator tended to any nonzero value the quotient would be unbounded and no finite limit could exist. Therefore a finite limit requires the numerator to vanish at $x=3$. (M1)分母趋于 $0$。若分子趋于任一非零值,则商无界,不可能存在有限极限。因此有限极限要求分子在 $x=3$ 处取零。(M1)

Solve for $k$求解 $k$ A1

$$ 3^{2}+3k-12=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; 3k-3=0 \;\Longrightarrow\; k=1. $$

(A1)

Factor and evaluate分解并求值 A1

$$ \lim_{x\to 3}\frac{x^{2}+x-12}{x-3}=\lim_{x\to 3}\frac{(x+4)(x-3)}{x-3}=\lim_{x\to 3}(x+4)=7. $$

(A1)

Why the other options attract.其他选项的诱因。 (B) finds $k=1$ and factors correctly to $(x+4)(x-3)$, then reports the root $-4$ of the surviving factor instead of its value at $x=3$: the right factorisation read one line too far. (C) comes from a sign slip in $9+3k-12=0$, solving $3k=-3$. (D) is chosen by students who see $\tfrac{0}{0}$ and conclude no limit can exist, which inverts the rule: $\tfrac{0}{0}$ is the only form under which this limit can exist at all.(B) 求得 $k=1$ 并正确分解为 $(x+4)(x-3)$,却报出剩余因式的根 $-4$ 而非其在 $x=3$ 处的取值:分解无误,只是多读了一行。(C) 源于 $9+3k-12=0$ 中的符号失误,解成 $3k=-3$。(D) 出自看到 $\tfrac{0}{0}$ 便断定极限不存在的学生,这恰好颠倒了规则:$\tfrac{0}{0}$ 正是此极限得以存在的唯一形式。
Insight.要点。 Read this item backwards and it becomes routine. A quotient whose denominator vanishes has a finite limit only when the numerator vanishes at the same point, so "the limit exists" is a factor condition in disguise, and it pins the parameter before any algebra is done. The same reasoning is what later makes a rational function have a hole rather than a vertical asymptote.倒过来读,此题便化为常规。分母取零的商只有在分子于同一点取零时才有有限极限,故「极限存在」实为伪装过的因式条件,它在任何代数运算之前就已确定了参数。同样的推理正是后续判断有理函数在某点是空心点而非竖直渐近线的依据。
PART IIShow All Work展示完整解题过程

Free-Response Solutions自由解答题解析

FRQ 1MEDIUM 1.4 / 1.5 / 1.6 Evaluating Limits1.4 / 1.5 / 1.6 求极限No Calculator[8 marks]

Evaluate, showing all algebraic steps: (a) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 5}\dfrac{x^{2}-25}{x^{2}-4x-5}$; (b) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 9}\dfrac{x-9}{\sqrt{x}-3}$; (c) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\dfrac{\sin(3x)}{\tan(2x)}$. (d) A table of $g$ near $x=2$ approaches $5$ from both sides; a student claims it proves $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}g(x)=5$. State what the table does and does not establish.计算下列各极限并展示完整代数步骤:(a) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 5}\dfrac{x^{2}-25}{x^{2}-4x-5}$;(b) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 9}\dfrac{x-9}{\sqrt{x}-3}$;(c) $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\dfrac{\sin(3x)}{\tan(2x)}$。(d) 某表显示 $g$ 在 $x=2$ 附近自两侧趋近 $5$,学生据此断言此表证明了 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 2}g(x)=5$。请说明该表能确立什么、不能确立什么。

Answers:答案:  (a) $\dfrac{5}{3}$  ·  (b) $6$  ·  (c) $\dfrac{3}{2}$  ·  (d) the table supports $5$ as an estimate but establishes nothing该表支持以 $5$ 为估计值,但不能确立任何结论

(a) Factor both quadratics(a) 对两个二次式因式分解 M1·A1

$x^{2}-25=(x-5)(x+5)$ and $x^{2}-4x-5=(x-5)(x+1)$. (M1)$x^{2}-25=(x-5)(x+5)$,$x^{2}-4x-5=(x-5)(x+1)$。(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to 5}\frac{(x-5)(x+5)}{(x-5)(x+1)}=\lim_{x\to 5}\frac{x+5}{x+1}=\frac{10}{6}=\frac{5}{3}. $$

(A1)

(b) Factor the denominator as a difference of squares(b) 将分母按平方差因式分解 M1·A1

Write $x-9=(\sqrt{x}-3)(\sqrt{x}+3)$: (M1)写 $x-9=(\sqrt{x}-3)(\sqrt{x}+3)$:(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to 9}\frac{(\sqrt{x}-3)(\sqrt{x}+3)}{\sqrt{x}-3}=\lim_{x\to 9}(\sqrt{x}+3)=3+3=6. $$

(A1)

(c) Rewrite $\tan$ and engineer both standard forms(c) 展开 $\tan$ 并凑出两个标准形式 M1·A1

Since $\tan(2x)=\dfrac{\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)}$, rewrite the quotient as: (M1)因 $\tan(2x)=\dfrac{\sin(2x)}{\cos(2x)}$,将商式改写为:(M1)

$$ \frac{\sin(3x)}{\tan(2x)}=\frac{\sin(3x)\cos(2x)}{\sin(2x)}=\frac{3}{2}\cdot\frac{\sin(3x)}{3x}\cdot\frac{2x}{\sin(2x)}\cdot\cos(2x)\longrightarrow\frac{3}{2}\cdot 1\cdot 1\cdot 1=\frac{3}{2}. $$

(A1)

(d) What a table can and cannot settle(d) 表格能与不能确立的结论 M1·R1

What it establishes: the six tabulated values approach $5$ from both sides, so $5$ is the only sensible *estimate* the table supports, and the table is enough to rule out any competing estimate that disagrees with those entries. (M1)该表能确立的:六个表列值自两侧趋近 $5$,故 $5$ 是该表所支持的唯一合理**估计值**,且该表足以排除与这些取值相抵触的其他估计。(M1)

What it does not establish: a table samples finitely many points. Nothing in it constrains $g$ *between* the sampled inputs, so no table can prove a limit exists. A function agreeing with all six entries can still oscillate without limit as $x\to 2$. Proving the value needs algebra or a theorem; the table only suggests which value to prove. (R1)该表不能确立的:表格只采样有限个点,对采样点**之间**的 $g$ 没有任何约束,因此任何表格都无法证明极限存在。与全部六个取值吻合的函数,仍可能在 $x\to 2$ 时无极限地振荡。要证明该值需借助代数或定理,表格只提示应去证明哪个值。(R1)

Insight.要点。 Three different $0/0$ signatures, three different repairs: a shared polynomial factor (a), a surd difference of squares (b), and a ratio of trig functions that both vanish at $0$ (c). In (c), $\tan(2x)\sim 2x$ works exactly like $\sin(2x)\sim 2x$ because $\cos(2x)\to 1$; the general rule $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{\sin(ax)}{\tan(bx)}=\frac{a}{b}$ is worth keeping as a shortcut once you have derived it once.三种不同的 $0/0$ 特征,对应三种不同的化简方法:(a) 共有多项式因子;(b) 根式的平方差;(c) 两个同时趋于 $0$ 的三角函数之比。在 (c) 中,$\tan(2x)\sim 2x$ 与 $\sin(2x)\sim 2x$ 的表现完全一致,因为 $\cos(2x)\to 1$;一般结论 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{\sin(ax)}{\tan(bx)}=\frac{a}{b}$ 一旦推导过一次,便值得作为捷径记住。
FRQ 2MEDIUM 1.11 / 1.12 Continuity & Parameters1.11 / 1.12 连续性与参数No Calculator[9 marks]

$f(x)=\begin{cases} \dfrac{x^{2}-x-6}{x-3}, & x<3\\[4pt] ax+b, & 3\le x\le 5\\[4pt] x^{2}-9, & x>5 \end{cases}$

Answers:答案:  (a) $5$  ·  (b) $a=\dfrac{11}{2},\ b=-\dfrac{23}{2}$  ·  (c) corners (jump discontinuities in $f'$) at both $x=3$ and $x=5$$f'$ 在 $x=3$ 和 $x=5$ 处均为拐角(跳跃不连续)

(a) Left limit at $x=3$(a) $x=3$ 处的左极限 M1·A1

Factor: $x^{2}-x-6=(x-3)(x+2)$, so for $x<3$, $f(x)=\dfrac{(x-3)(x+2)}{x-3}=x+2$. (M1)因式分解:$x^{2}-x-6=(x-3)(x+2)$,故当 $x<3$ 时,$f(x)=\dfrac{(x-3)(x+2)}{x-3}=x+2$。(M1)

Hence $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 3^{-}}f(x)=3+2=5$. Because $f$ must be continuous at $x=3$, the middle piece must satisfy $f(3)=3a+b=5$: this is the restriction on $a$ and $b$. (A1)故 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 3^{-}}f(x)=3+2=5$。因 $f$ 须在 $x=3$ 处连续,中间段须满足 $f(3)=3a+b=5$:这就是对 $a$、$b$ 的限制。(A1)

(b) Solve the system from both junctions(b) 由两个接合点求解方程组 M1·A1·M1·A1

From (a): $3a+b=5$. (M1)由 (a):$3a+b=5$。(M1)

At $x=5$, continuity requires $f(5)=5a+b$ to equal $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 5^{+}}(x^{2}-9)=25-9=16$, so $5a+b=16$. (A1)在 $x=5$ 处,连续性要求 $f(5)=5a+b$ 等于 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 5^{+}}(x^{2}-9)=25-9=16$,故 $5a+b=16$。(A1)

Subtracting the equations: $2a=11$, so $a=\dfrac{11}{2}$. (M1)两式相减:$2a=11$,故 $a=\dfrac{11}{2}$。(M1)

Back-substitute: $b=5-3a=5-\dfrac{33}{2}=-\dfrac{23}{2}$. (A1)代回:$b=5-3a=5-\dfrac{33}{2}=-\dfrac{23}{2}$。(A1)

(c) Compare one-sided derivatives at each seam(c) 比较两个接缝处的单侧导数 M1·A1·A1

With $a=\tfrac{11}{2}$, the three pieces have derivatives $1$ (from $x+2$, $x<3$), $\tfrac{11}{2}$ (from $ax+b$, $35$). (M1)取 $a=\tfrac{11}{2}$,三段的导数分别为 $1$(来自 $x+2$,$x<3$)、$\tfrac{11}{2}$(来自 $ax+b$,$35$)。(M1)

At $x=3$: left derivative $=1$, right derivative $=\tfrac{11}{2}$; since $1\ne\tfrac{11}{2}$, $f'$ jumps, so $f$ has a corner (not differentiable) at $x=3$. (A1)在 $x=3$ 处:左导数 $=1$,右导数 $=\tfrac{11}{2}$;因 $1\ne\tfrac{11}{2}$,$f'$ 跳跃,故 $f$ 在 $x=3$ 处出现拐角(不可导)。(A1)

At $x=5$: left derivative $=\tfrac{11}{2}$, right derivative $=2(5)=10$; since $\tfrac{11}{2}\ne 10$, $f'$ again jumps, so $f$ has a corner at $x=5$ as well. (A1)在 $x=5$ 处:左导数 $=\tfrac{11}{2}$,右导数 $=2(5)=10$;因 $\tfrac{11}{2}\ne 10$,$f'$ 再次跳跃,故 $f$ 在 $x=5$ 处同样出现拐角。(A1)

Insight.要点。 Continuity of $f$ is one equation per seam; differentiability of $f$ is an extra, independent condition at that same seam. A function can be made perfectly continuous (as here) while its derivative still jumps, since matching values and matching slopes are two separate demands. This is exactly the derivative-of-a-piecewise-function idea that Unit 2 builds on.$f$ 的连续性在每个接缝处对应一个方程;而 $f$ 在同一接缝处的可导性则是额外的、独立的条件。一个函数可以完全连续(如本题),但其导数仍然跳跃,因为"函数值匹配"与"斜率匹配"是两个独立的要求。这正是第二单元将建立的分段函数求导思想的基础。
FRQ 3MEDIUM 1.13 - 1.15 Asymptotes1.13 - 1.15 渐近线No Calculator[9 marks]

Let $f(x)=\dfrac{2x^{2}-x-6}{x^{2}-4}$.设 $f(x)=\dfrac{2x^{2}-x-6}{x^{2}-4}$。

Answers:答案:  (a) $x=-2$  ·  (b) hole at空洞在 $\left(2,\tfrac{7}{4}\right)$  ·  (c) $y=2$

(a) Factor first, then locate the surviving zero(a) 先因式分解,再确定不消去的零点 M1·A1·A1

Factor: $2x^{2}-x-6=(x-2)(2x+3)$ and $x^{2}-4=(x-2)(x+2)$, so $f(x)=\dfrac{2x+3}{x+2}$ for $x\ne 2$. (M1)因式分解:$2x^{2}-x-6=(x-2)(2x+3)$,$x^{2}-4=(x-2)(x+2)$,故当 $x\ne 2$ 时 $f(x)=\dfrac{2x+3}{x+2}$。(M1)

The factor $(x+2)$ does not cancel, and at $x=-2$ the reduced numerator is $2(-2)+3=-1\ne 0$, so $x=-2$ is a vertical asymptote. As $x\to -2^{+}$, the denominator $\to 0^{+}$ with numerator near $-1$, so $f\to-\infty$. (A1)因子 $(x+2)$ 不消去,且在 $x=-2$ 处约简后分子为 $2(-2)+3=-1\ne 0$,故 $x=-2$ 为竖直渐近线。当 $x\to -2^{+}$ 时,分母 $\to 0^{+}$,分子接近 $-1$,故 $f\to-\infty$。(A1)

As $x\to -2^{-}$, the denominator $\to 0^{-}$ with numerator still near $-1$, so $f\to+\infty$. (A1)当 $x\to -2^{-}$ 时,分母 $\to 0^{-}$,分子仍接近 $-1$,故 $f\to+\infty$。(A1)

(b) The cancelling factor gives a hole(b) 可消去因子给出空洞 M1·M1·A1

The factor $(x-2)$ cancels top and bottom, so $f$ is undefined but not asymptotic at $x=2$. (M1)因子 $(x-2)$ 在分子分母中均可消去,故 $f$ 在 $x=2$ 处无定义但不是渐近线。(M1)

The hole sits at the limiting height of the reduced form: (M1)空洞位于约简形式的极限高度处:(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to 2}\frac{2x+3}{x+2}=\frac{7}{4}. $$

So there is a removable discontinuity, a hole, at $\left(2,\tfrac{7}{4}\right)$. (A1)故存在一个可去不连续点,即空洞,位于 $\left(2,\tfrac{7}{4}\right)$。(A1)

(c) Equal degrees give the leading-coefficient ratio(c) 次数相等时取最高次系数之比 M1·A1·A1

Numerator and denominator of the original $f$ both have degree $2$, so divide by $x^{2}$: (M1)原式 $f$ 的分子分母次数均为 $2$,故除以 $x^{2}$:(M1)

$$ \lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\frac{2x^{2}-x-6}{x^{2}-4}=\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}\frac{2-1/x-6/x^{2}}{1-4/x^{2}}=\frac{2}{1}=2. $$

Both $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ and $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to-\infty}f(x)$ equal $2$. (A1) The horizontal asymptote is $y=2$. (A1)$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ 与 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to-\infty}f(x)$ 均等于 $2$。(A1) 水平渐近线为 $y=2$。(A1)

Insight.要点。 Factor first, always: a cancelling factor is a hole, a surviving one is a vertical asymptote, and before you factor the two zeros of the denominator look identical. Sign analysis at the asymptote is cleanest on the reduced form, tracking only whether the surviving denominator approaches $0$ from above or below.始终先因式分解:可消去的因子对应空洞,不可消去的因子对应竖直渐近线,而在因式分解之前,分母的这两个零点看起来完全相同。渐近线处的符号分析在约简形式下最为清晰,只需判断保留的分母从正侧还是负侧趋于零。
FRQ 4HARDFRQ LEVEL 1.16 IVT Application (Table)1.16 介值定理应用(表格)Calculator[10 marks]

A diver's depth $d(t)$ in meters at time $t$ seconds is continuous on $[0,20]$, with the values in the table above.潜水员的深度 $d(t)$(单位:米)在时刻 $t$(单位:秒)处连续,定义在 $[0,20]$ 上,取值如表所示。

$t$ (s)04101520
$d(t)$ (m)0822185
Answers:答案:  (a) IVT on $[4,10]$在 $[4,10]$ 上用介值定理  ·  (b) yes, via $[15,20]$是,用 $[15,20]$  ·  (c) incorrect不正确  ·  (d) $2$

(a) Bracket $15$ between two tabulated values in $(0,10)$(a) 在 $(0,10)$ 内用两个表格值夹住 $15$ M1·A1·R1

On $[4,10]\subset[0,20]$, $d$ is continuous (given). (M1)在 $[4,10]\subset[0,20]$ 上,$d$ 连续(已知)。(M1)

$d(4)=8$ and $d(10)=22$, and $15$ lies between $8$ and $22$. (A1)$d(4)=8$,$d(10)=22$,且 $15$ 介于 $8$ 与 $22$ 之间。(A1)

By the IVT, there exists $c\in(4,10)\subset(0,10)$ with $d(c)=15$. (R1)由介值定理,存在 $c\in(4,10)\subset(0,10)$ 使 $d(c)=15$。(R1)

(b) Test the subinterval $[15,20]$(b) 检验子区间 $[15,20]$ M1·A1·R1

On $[10,15]$, $d(10)=22$ and $d(15)=18$ are both above $15$, so this subinterval alone does not bracket $15$. But on $[15,20]\subset[0,20]$, $d$ is continuous. (M1)在 $[10,15]$ 上,$d(10)=22$ 与 $d(15)=18$ 均大于 $15$,故该子区间本身无法夹住 $15$。但在 $[15,20]\subset[0,20]$ 上,$d$ 连续。(M1)

$d(15)=18$ and $d(20)=5$, and $15$ lies between $5$ and $18$. (A1)$d(15)=18$,$d(20)=5$,且 $15$ 介于 $5$ 与 $18$ 之间。(A1)

By the IVT, there exists $c\in(15,20)\subset(10,20)$ with $d(c)=15$: yes, the IVT is enough, using the subinterval $[15,20]$ rather than the whole of $[10,20]$. (R1)由介值定理,存在 $c\in(15,20)\subset(10,20)$ 使 $d(c)=15$:是的,介值定理足以得出结论,只需使用子区间 $[15,20]$,而非整个 $[10,20]$。(R1)

(c) Check whether $25$ is bracketed by any two tabulated values(c) 检验是否存在两个表格值夹住 $25$ A1·R1

Every tabulated value of $d$ is at most $22$, so no two consecutive entries bracket $25$: there is no pair $d(t_1)\lt 25\lt d(t_2)$ (or reverse) available to apply the IVT to. (A1)表中所有 $d$ 值均不超过 $22$,故不存在任何相邻两项夹住 $25$:找不到满足 $d(t_1)\lt 25\lt d(t_2)$(或相反)的一对数据来应用介值定理。(A1)

The claim is incorrect: the IVT never guarantees a value outside the range spanned by known outputs, so nothing here certifies $d(t)=25$ anywhere on $[0,20]$. (R1)该说法不正确:介值定理绝不会保证已知输出范围之外的某个值一定被取到,故本题数据无法证明 $[0,20]$ 上任何时刻有 $d(t)=25$。(R1)

(d) Count guaranteed crossings of the level $15$(d) 统计穿越 $15$ 这一水平线的保证次数 A1·R1

Compare each tabulated value to $15$: $d(0)=0$ (below), $d(4)=8$ (below), $d(10)=22$ (above), $d(15)=18$ (above), $d(20)=5$ (below). Crossings are guaranteed only where consecutive values sit on opposite sides of $15$: between $t=4$ and $t=10$, and between $t=15$ and $t=20$. (A1)将各表格值与 $15$ 比较:$d(0)=0$(低于),$d(4)=8$(低于),$d(10)=22$(高于),$d(15)=18$(高于),$d(20)=5$(低于)。只有相邻值分别位于 $15$ 两侧时才保证有穿越:即 $t=4$ 与 $t=10$ 之间,以及 $t=15$ 与 $t=20$ 之间。(A1)

That gives two guaranteed crossings, so the diver is at depth $15$ meters at least $2$ times on $[0,20]$. (R1)共有两次保证穿越,故潜水员在 $[0,20]$ 上至少 $2$ 次处于 $15$ 米深处。(R1)

Insight.要点。 The IVT is an existence theorem, not a search procedure: it certifies a crossing without locating it. Parts (a) and (b) show that the right subinterval to bracket a target value is not always the obvious endpoint-to-endpoint one; part (c) shows the theorem cannot extrapolate beyond the data it is given; part (d) shows that counting sign changes against a target level, not just against $0$, is the general technique behind every "minimum number of times" question.介值定理是一个存在性定理,而非搜索程序:它只保证穿越的存在,而不定位穿越点。(a)、(b) 表明用于夹住目标值的正确子区间未必是最显眼的端点到端点区间;(c) 表明该定理无法对已知数据范围之外的情形作出外推;(d) 表明针对某个目标水平线(而非仅针对 $0$)统计变号次数,正是所有"至少多少次"类问题背后的通用技巧。
AP rubric, 10 points.AP 评分标准,共 10 分。 (a) 1: states $d$ continuous on the chosen closed subinterval · 1: cites $d(4)=8$, $d(10)=22$ and that $15$ lies between them · 1: names the IVT and concludes existence of $c$ in the open interval. (b) 1: recognises $[10,15]$ fails to bracket · 1: cites $d(15)=18$, $d(20)=5$ · 1: names the IVT and concludes. (c) 1: observes every tabulated value is at most $22$ · 1: concludes the claim is unsupported, with the reason that the IVT cannot certify a value outside the observed outputs. (d) 1: identifies both sign changes relative to the level $15$ · 1: answers $2$ with justification. No point is awarded for a correct conclusion whose justification omits continuity. (a) 1 分:说明 $d$ 在所选闭子区间上连续 · 1 分:引用 $d(4)=8$、$d(10)=22$ 且 $15$ 介于两者之间 · 1 分:写出介值定理名称并得出开区间内存在 $c$ 的结论。(b) 1 分:识别出 $[10,15]$ 无法夹住目标值 · 1 分:引用 $d(15)=18$、$d(20)=5$ · 1 分:写出定理名称并得出结论。(c) 1 分:指出表中各值均不超过 $22$ · 1 分:结论为该说法缺乏依据,并说明介值定理无法保证已观测输出范围之外的取值。(d) 1 分:找出相对于水平线 $15$ 的两次变号 · 1 分:答 $2$ 并给出论证。若论证中遗漏连续性,即使结论正确亦不给分。
FRQ 5HARDFRQ LEVEL 1.8 Squeeze & Definition1.8 夹逼定理与定义No Calculator[9 marks]

Let $f(x)=x^{2}\cos\!\bigl(\tfrac{1}{x}\bigr)$ for $x\ne 0$, and define $f(0)=0$.设 $f(x)=x^{2}\cos\!\bigl(\tfrac{1}{x}\bigr)$($x\ne 0$),并定义 $f(0)=0$。

Answers:答案:  (a) $0$ (by squeeze由夹逼定理)  ·  (b) continuous, since the limit equals $f(0)$连续,因极限等于 $f(0)$  ·  (c) $0=f'(0)$

(a) Bound $\cos(1/x)$, then multiply by $x^{2}\ge 0$(a) 界定 $\cos(1/x)$,再乘以 $x^{2}\ge 0$ M1·M1·A1·R1

For all $x\ne 0$, $-1\le\cos\!\left(\tfrac{1}{x}\right)\le 1$. (M1)对所有 $x\ne 0$,$-1\le\cos\!\left(\tfrac{1}{x}\right)\le 1$。(M1)

Multiplying through by $x^{2}\ge 0$ preserves the inequality direction: (M1)乘以 $x^{2}\ge 0$ 不改变不等号方向:(M1)

$$ -x^{2}\le x^{2}\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)\le x^{2}. $$

Both $-x^{2}\to 0$ and $x^{2}\to 0$ as $x\to 0$. (A1)当 $x\to 0$ 时,$-x^{2}\to 0$ 且 $x^{2}\to 0$。(A1)

Since the trapped quantity $f(x)$ is squeezed between two functions with the same limit, the Squeeze Theorem gives $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$. (R1)因被夹量 $f(x)$ 夹在两个极限相同的函数之间,由夹逼定理得 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$。(R1)

(b) Compare the limit to the defined value(b) 比较极限与已定义的函数值 A1·R1

Part (a) shows $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$, and by definition $f(0)=0$. (A1)由 (a),$\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$,且由定义 $f(0)=0$。(A1)

Since the limit exists and equals the function's value at that point, $f$ satisfies the definition of continuity at $x=0$. (R1)因极限存在且等于该点处的函数值,$f$ 满足在 $x=0$ 处连续的定义。(R1)

(c) Squeeze the difference quotient(c) 对差商用夹逼定理 M1·A1·R1

$\displaystyle\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0}=\frac{x^{2}\cos(1/x)-0}{x}=x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$ for $x\ne 0$. (M1)当 $x\ne 0$ 时,$\displaystyle\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0}=\frac{x^{2}\cos(1/x)-0}{x}=x\cos\!\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)$。(M1)

Since $-1\le\cos(1/x)\le 1$, multiplying by $|x|$ (to keep the inequality valid whether $x$ is positive or negative) gives $-|x|\le x\cos(1/x)\le |x|$, and both bounds $\to 0$ as $x\to 0$, so by the Squeeze Theorem $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0}=0$. (A1)因 $-1\le\cos(1/x)\le 1$,乘以 $|x|$(以保证不论 $x$ 正负不等式均成立)得 $-|x|\le x\cos(1/x)\le |x|$,且当 $x\to 0$ 时两界均 $\to 0$,由夹逼定理得 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x-0}=0$。(A1)

This limit is exactly $f'(0)$, so $f$ is differentiable at $x=0$ with $f'(0)=0$: the tangent line to $f$ at the origin is horizontal. (R1)该极限正是 $f'(0)$,故 $f$ 在 $x=0$ 处可导,且 $f'(0)=0$:$f$ 在原点处的切线为水平线。(R1)

Insight.要点。 The same squeeze idea powers all three parts: an oscillating, badly-behaved factor $\cos(1/x)$ gets crushed by a vanishing envelope, first $x^{2}$ (for the limit), then $|x|$ (for the derivative). Note the switch from $x^{2}$ to $|x|$ in (c): the multiplier in a squeeze must itself be nonnegative to keep the inequality direction intact, and $x$ alone can be negative, which is exactly why $|x|$ (not $x$) bounds $x\cos(1/x)$.同一个夹逼思想贯穿全部三个部分:振荡且性质不佳的因子 $\cos(1/x)$ 被一个趋于零的包络所压制,先是 $x^{2}$(用于求极限),再是 $|x|$(用于求导数)。注意 (c) 中从 $x^{2}$ 换为 $|x|$:夹逼中的乘子本身必须非负才能保持不等号方向不变,而 $x$ 本身可正可负,这正是为何界定 $x\cos(1/x)$ 须用 $|x|$ 而非 $x$ 的原因。
AP rubric, 9 points.AP 评分标准,共 9 分。 (a) 1: states $-1\le\cos(1/x)\le 1$ · 1: multiplies by $x^{2}$ and notes $x^{2}\ge 0$ preserves the direction · 1: both bounds tend to $0$ · 1: names the Squeeze Theorem and concludes. (b) 1: cites both $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$ and $f(0)=0$ · 1: concludes continuity by the definition, not by appeal to "the graph looks unbroken". (c) 1: simplifies the difference quotient to $x\cos(1/x)$ · 1: bounds it by $\pm|x|$, with $|x|$ rather than $x$ · 1: concludes the limit is $0$ and identifies it as $f'(0)$. A squeeze argument that omits the direction-preserving step, or that bounds by $x$ instead of $|x|$ in (c), loses that point even with the correct final value. (a) 1 分:写出 $-1\le\cos(1/x)\le 1$ · 1 分:两边乘以 $x^{2}$ 并指出 $x^{2}\ge 0$ 保持不等号方向 · 1 分:说明两界均趋于 $0$ · 1 分:写出夹逼定理名称并得出结论。(b) 1 分:同时引用 $\displaystyle\lim_{x\to 0}f(x)=0$ 与 $f(0)=0$ · 1 分:依连续性定义得出结论,而非以「图像看起来不断裂」为据。(c) 1 分:将差商化简为 $x\cos(1/x)$ · 1 分:用 $\pm|x|$ 而非 $\pm x$ 作界 · 1 分:得出极限为 $0$ 并指明其即 $f'(0)$。夹逼论证若遗漏保持方向这一步,或在 (c) 中以 $x$ 代替 $|x|$ 作界,即使最终数值正确亦不得该分。
FRQ 6HARDFRQ LEVEL 1.11 / 1.16 Piecewise Model in Context1.11 / 1.16 情境中的分段模型No Calculator[9 marks]

The courier charge $C(w)$ in dollars, for parcel weight $w$ in kilograms, with $k$ a positive constant.快递费用 $C(w)$(单位:美元),$w$ 为包裹重量(单位:千克),$k$ 为正常数。

$$ C(w)=\begin{cases} 8, & 0 \lt w \le 2\\[4pt] 8+k(w-2), & 2 \lt w \le 10\\[4pt] 40-\dfrac{120}{w}, & 10 \lt w \le 30 \end{cases} $$

Answers:答案:  (a) both limits $8$; continuous for every $k$两极限均为 $8$;对一切 $k$ 均连续  ·  (b) $k=2.5$  ·  (c) $\$2.50$ per kilogram每千克  ·  (d) IVT on $[10,30]$在 $[10,30]$ 上用介值定理

(a) Both one-sided limits at $w=2$(a) $w=2$ 处的两个单侧极限 M1·A1·R1

Approaching from the left, $C$ is the constant $8$, so $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{-}}C(w)=8$. (M1)从左侧趋近时,$C$ 恒为 $8$,故 $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{-}}C(w)=8$。(M1)

Approaching from the right, $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{+}}\bigl[8+k(w-2)\bigr]=8+k(0)=8$. The value at the point is $C(2)=8$, since $w=2$ belongs to the first branch. (A1)从右侧趋近时,$\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{+}}\bigl[8+k(w-2)\bigr]=8+k(0)=8$。该点处的函数值为 $C(2)=8$,因为 $w=2$ 属于第一段。(A1)

All three agree at $8$, so $C$ is continuous at $w=2$. The conclusion does not depend on $k$: the factor $(w-2)$ multiplying $k$ vanishes at $w=2$, so no choice of $k$ can move the right-hand limit away from $8$. (R1)三者均等于 $8$,故 $C$ 在 $w=2$ 处连续。该结论不依赖于 $k$:与 $k$ 相乘的因子 $(w-2)$ 在 $w=2$ 处取零,故任何 $k$ 值都无法使右极限偏离 $8$。(R1)

(b) Match the branches at $w=10$(b) 在 $w=10$ 处使两段衔接 M1·A1

Here $w=10$ belongs to the middle branch, so $C(10)=8+k(10-2)=8+8k$, and $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 10^{+}}C(w)=40-\dfrac{120}{10}=28$. Continuity requires these to be equal. (M1)此处 $w=10$ 属于中间一段,故 $C(10)=8+k(10-2)=8+8k$,而 $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 10^{+}}C(w)=40-\dfrac{120}{10}=28$。连续性要求二者相等。(M1)

$$ 8+8k=28 \;\Longrightarrow\; 8k=20 \;\Longrightarrow\; k=2.5. $$

(A1)

(c) Interpret $k$ in context(c) 结合情境解释 $k$ A1

On the middle branch the charge rises by $k$ dollars for each additional kilogram, so $k=2.5$ means the courier charges $\$2.50$ per kilogram on the portion of a parcel's weight above $2$ kilograms, up to $10$ kilograms. (A1)在中间一段,每增加一千克费用上升 $k$ 美元,故 $k=2.5$ 表示对包裹超过 $2$ 千克(至多至 $10$ 千克)的那部分重量,快递公司按每千克 $\$2.50$ 收费。(A1)

(d) Apply the Intermediate Value Theorem on $[10,30]$(d) 在 $[10,30]$ 上应用介值定理 M1·A1·R1

On $(10,30]$ the rule $40-\dfrac{120}{w}$ is a rational function whose only discontinuity is at $w=0$, which is outside the interval, so it is continuous there. With $k=2.5$ from part (b), the two branches agree at $w=10$, hence $C$ is continuous on the closed interval $[10,30]$. (M1)在 $(10,30]$ 上,$40-\dfrac{120}{w}$ 为有理函数,其唯一不连续点 $w=0$ 不在该区间内,故在此连续。取 (b) 中的 $k=2.5$,两段在 $w=10$ 处衔接,因此 $C$ 在闭区间 $[10,30]$ 上连续。(M1)

The endpoint charges are $C(10)=28$ and $C(30)=40-\dfrac{120}{30}=36$, and $28 \lt 35 \lt 36$. (A1)端点处的费用为 $C(10)=28$,$C(30)=40-\dfrac{120}{30}=36$,且 $28 \lt 35 \lt 36$。(A1)

By the Intermediate Value Theorem there exists $c\in(10,30)$ with $C(c)=35$: some parcel weight strictly between $10$ and $30$ kilograms is charged exactly $\$35$. (Solving confirms it: $40-\tfrac{120}{c}=35$ gives $c=24$ kilograms.) (R1)由介值定理,存在 $c\in(10,30)$ 使 $C(c)=35$:即存在严格介于 $10$ 与 $30$ 千克之间的某一重量,其费用恰为 $\$35$。(求解可验证:由 $40-\tfrac{120}{c}=35$ 得 $c=24$ 千克。)(R1)

Where the marks are usually lost.通常失分之处。 In (a), asserting continuity from the algebra alone without noticing that the answer is $k$-independent: the question asks explicitly whether the conclusion depends on $k$, and a reply that never mentions $k$ answers only half of it. In (b), evaluating the middle branch at $w=8$ rather than at $w=10$, having read $k(w-2)$ as a rule about the width of the interval. In (c), writing "$2.5$" with no units and no weight range, which scores nothing at AP. In (d), applying the IVT without first stating continuity on the closed interval, the single most-penalised omission on justification parts.在 (a) 中,仅凭代数便断言连续,却未察觉结论与 $k$ 无关:题目明确询问结论是否依赖于 $k$,若作答全然不提 $k$,则只答了一半。在 (b) 中,把 $k(w-2)$ 误解为关于区间宽度的规则,从而在 $w=8$ 而非 $w=10$ 处代入中间一段求值。在 (c) 中,只写「$2.5$」而不写单位与重量范围,在 AP 中不得分。在 (d) 中,未先说明函数在闭区间上连续便直接应用介值定理,这是论证类小题中扣分最多的遗漏。
Insight.要点。 A piecewise model is continuous exactly where the branches agree in value, and part (a) is the case that is easy to get right for the wrong reason: continuity there is automatic because the parameter is attached to a factor that vanishes at the join. Contrast part (b), where the join is genuinely a condition on $k$. Reading which junctions constrain a parameter and which do not is the whole skill, and it recurs every time a modelling FRQ hands you an unknown constant.分段模型恰在各段取值相衔接之处连续,而 (a) 正是容易「歪打正着」的情形:该处连续是自动成立的,因为参数所附的因子在衔接点取零。与之对照,(b) 中的衔接才真正构成对 $k$ 的条件。判别哪些衔接点会约束参数、哪些不会,正是本题的全部技能所在,且每当建模类自由解答题给出一个未知常数时,这一技能都会重现。
AP rubric, 9 points.AP 评分标准,共 9 分。 (a) 1: $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{-}}C(w)=8$ · 1: $\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{+}}C(w)=8$ together with $C(2)=8$ · 1: concludes continuity and states it holds for every $k$, with the reason that $(w-2)$ vanishes at $w=2$. (b) 1: sets up $8+8k=28$ · 1: $k=2.5$. (c) 1: rate interpretation carrying both the units (dollars per kilogram) and the weight range it applies to. (d) 1: states $C$ is continuous on the closed interval $[10,30]$ · 1: gives $C(10)=28$ and $C(30)=36$ and observes $35$ lies between them · 1: names the Intermediate Value Theorem and concludes existence of a weight in the open interval. A correct value of $c$ obtained by solving, with no IVT argument, earns the arithmetic point only. (a) 1 分:$\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{-}}C(w)=8$ · 1 分:$\displaystyle\lim_{w\to 2^{+}}C(w)=8$ 且 $C(2)=8$ · 1 分:得出连续的结论,并说明其对一切 $k$ 成立,理由为 $(w-2)$ 在 $w=2$ 处取零。(b) 1 分:建立方程 $8+8k=28$ · 1 分:$k=2.5$。(c) 1 分:作出速率解释,须同时写明单位(美元每千克)及其适用的重量范围。(d) 1 分:说明 $C$ 在闭区间 $[10,30]$ 上连续 · 1 分:给出 $C(10)=28$、$C(30)=36$ 并指出 $35$ 介于两者之间 · 1 分:写出介值定理名称并得出开区间内存在该重量的结论。若仅通过解方程求得 $c$ 而无介值定理论证,只得算术分。